A Reply To Angels 3

Once ‘One’ had been thrown into the realm of multiplicity, it remained itself actually. There was never an actual fracture but only referring to the involvement of numeric, another objectification of ‘One’, it makes the arisen of gnosis. As gnosis is necessarily dependent onto the fractualization of the conceptualization of ‘One’ although once, it remains unique.

Here comes the question of what agnostics is. It seems that it has been something conventionally considered as unknown but it has never been such a ‘Thing’ (Humanity) which was arisen from gnosis and this again brings out a question on whether there was something which is unknown!

Gnosis seems to be absolute because such a fracture has come from ‘One’ which remains its uniqueness as its unique gnosis. Once it had its reasoning thrown down from its unknown, there comes an erroneous gnosis which Humanity (Thing) sternly has always considered as agnostics (a state of ignorance).

Once, it has thrown, reasoning is the master of our visualization under the circumstances that it leads to the gnosis which is the materialism realm where ‘Thing’ depends on the conceptualization of gnosis and agnostics to have the worldliness brought into life!

Gnosis is really a mystery! So existence should have ostracized agnostics but in fact, the concept of agnostics is embedded into the thesaurus of cosmology. There comes ‘The Ignorance’!